|Clock Of Destiny Moorish International Order Of The Great Seal Of 360°|
“Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law for it is the
author and source of law;”
“There is no
such thing as a power of inherent Sovereignty in the government of the
In this country sovereignty
resides in the People,
and Congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their
Constitution entrusted to it: All else is withheld.”
This is clear that Congress must act in line with the United States Constitution and that the Moors need to learn this document as we invested them with certain powers to act on our behalf. Therefore, more must hold them accountable when their birthrights are being infringed on. But Moors must learn to do it with love and respect.
We the People, for the People and by the People At that time the people that called themselves Black, African- American etc were subjects of the state with no rights the white man was bound to respect. You can see it to today even with the Trayvon case in Florida where this caucasian shot an un- armed youth without being in danger of his life. In return he was placed on bail, released and reprisoned. The press helped financed all his court fees. Other Caucasians donated money via their website. You see, nothing has changed regarding the Dred Scott decision. That is only one situation. We did not mentioned when white cops kill our black youth and adults and get acquitted.
This even applies to the Moorish- American descendants before they reclaimed their Moorish Birthrights. ‘We the People’ apply today to the Moorish Americans, Free ‘white’ Christians and Jews. They all having a nationality, therefore sovereignty lies in the free people. Another verification besides law is Diplomatic relation (Book) the Premier pointed out in all his law classes that the Dey of Algiers was noted as one of the founding fathers of this county. Moors are descendants of the Moroccans but born in America. This is backed by two resolutions from 1933 and 1994. Moorish Americans, your problem is not with the Federal Government but the States of the Union.
VERY IMPORTANT FOR ALL TO READ:
There are three questions that the people would like answered and we would like to note it clear as day:
Question: When an individual reclaim their Moorish Nationality and Birthrights are they given up their citizenship?
Answer: The Answer is NO! Moors are American citizens. They reclaim their Moorish descent or bloodline based on evidence of research and the resolutions they are in possession of. They are entitled to every right or privilege every 14 amendment citizen, Declaration Citizen and ‘White Person is entitle to. Also the world MUST be clear that the Moorish- American is pro federal government with respect of State government. The Moors respect the state government, however in the pass and many problems that citizens are encountering has always been created by state governments. It was the United States Government that always came to the aid of the Asiatic People whenever the State over stepped their boundaries.
Question: What about those People that call themselves Moors that want to pull away from being an American Citizen?
Answer: They were influenced by the patriot/militia/sovereign groups materials. They use the name Moor as an attempt to justify their acts and beliefs. They are not members of the Moorish National and Divine Movement nor the Clock of Destiny Founded by C.M. Bey. They are separate groups that created their own program.
Question: Thirdly: Do the Moorish- Americans Vote????
Yes, Moorish American Vote. The prophet Noble Drew Ali told the Moors to cast a National Ballot. Also it was the Moors in Chicago that help the first republican ( Oscar Depriest) in office. Also the prophet asked the Moors if they wanted an Asiatic Chief of Police.
Moors suppose to vote as the elected public trust officers suppose to answer to the will and pleasure of the people that appointed them into office, we Moors supposes to hold them accountable. ALL MOORS SHOULD HAVE A VOTERS CARD.
The Moorish-Americans were originally republicans just as many Asiatics were during the founding of this country. However, many Moors are also democrats. Many Moors today are attempting to establish a new party called the New Era Party. The reason a New Era Party is in formation is because many citizens are dissatisfied of their conditions and feel that a new party will best serve their true interest.
Also as our duty as Moors are to uplift Fallen humanity whatever our decision is should be to make the conditions of the people in North America ( North Gate) better thsn reach out to the world.
"The sovereignty of a state does not reside in the persons who fill the
different departments of its government, but in the People,
from whom the government emanated; and they may change it at their
discretion. Sovereignty, then in this country, abides with the
constituency, and not with the agent; and this remark is true, both in
reference to the federal and state government."
See many Moors are trying to function on the outside of this great government but never took the time out to study what was given to them to learn how to work in the Government. There are many Moors that are working in this Government but also there are many on the outside looking in because they placed themselves on the outside.
"In Europe, the Executive is almost synonymous with the Sovereign power
of a State; and, generally, includes legislative and judicial authority.
When, therefore, writers speak of the sovereign, it is not necessarily
in exclusion of the judiciary; and it will often be found, that when the
Executive affords a remedy for any wrong, it is nothing more than by an
exercise of its judicial authority. Such
is the condition of power in that quarter of the world, where it is too
commonly acquired by force, or fraud, or both, and seldom by compact. In
America, however, the case is widely different. Our
government is founded upon compact. Sovereignty was, and is, in the
was entrusted by them, as far as was necessary for the purpose of
forming a good government, to the Federal Convention; and the Convention
executed their trust, by effectually separating the Legislative,
Judicial, and Executive powers; which, in the contemplation of our
Constitution, are each a branch of the sovereignty. The well-being of
the whole depends upon keeping each department within its limits."
Legal Status of Black People in America
They are 14th Amendment Citizens.
All Moors must Never forget what the Prophet Noble Drew Ali said, ‘If all men and women are equal before Good with inalienable rights’ as recorded in the Declaration of Independence then there is no need for amendment 14 and 15.
Amendment 14 and 15 apply to the ‘blacks’ that were called Negroes at that time. It never was written for Jews, ‘White’ Christians’ Turks or Moors.
“The people of the United States resident within any State are subject
to two governments: one State, and the other National; but there need be
no conflict between the two. The powers which one possesses, the other
does not. They are established for different purposes, and have separate
they make one whole, and furnish the people of the United States with a
complete government, ample for the protection of all their rights at
home and abroad. True, it may sometimes happen that a person is amenable
to both jurisdictions for one and the same act. Thus, if a marshal of
the United States is unlawfully resisted while executing the process of
the courts within a State, and the resistance is accompanied by an
assault on the officer, the sovereignty of the United States is violated
by the resistance, and that of the State by the breach of peace, in the
assault. So, too, if one passes counterfeited coin of the United States
within a State, it may be an offence against the United States and the
State: the United States, because it discredits the coin; and the State,
because of the fraud upon him to whom it is passed. This does not,
however, necessarily imply that the two governments possess powers in
common, or bring them into conflict with each other. It is the natural
consequence of a citizenship [92 U.S. 542, 551] which owes allegiance to
two sovereignties, and claims protection from both. The
citizen cannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to
such a form of government. He
owes allegiance to the two departments by choice and blind consent, so
to speak, and within their respective spheres must pay the penalties
which each exacts for disobedience to its laws. In return, he can demand
protection from each within its own jurisdiction.”
What Subject ‘Black’ and Latin’ People to the Jurisdiction? Also take note that Latino’s are not Spanish because Spanish is a language.
How, then, did you “voluntarily submit” yourself to such a form of government and thereby contract with that government for “protection”? If people fully understood how they did this, many of them would probably immediately withdraw their consent and completely drop out of the corrupted, inefficient, and usurious system of government we have, now wouldn’t they? We have spent six long years researching this question, and our research shows that it wasn’t your citizenship as a “national” but not statutory “citizen” pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(21) and 8 U.S.C. §1452 that made you subject to their civil laws. Well then, what was it?
It was your voluntary choice of domicile!
In fact, the “citizen” the Supreme Administrative Court is talking about above is a statutory “citizen” and not a constitutional “citizen, free National citizen but an 14th amendment citizen”, and the only way you can become subject to statutory civil law is to have a domicile within the jurisdiction of the sovereign voluntarily and NOT reserve your rights under Bey or El. There is BIG misunderstanding that if you reclaim Moorish Nationality you will be deported, you cannot continue to receive Federal Benefits, you cannot vote, you cannot have a Federal Social Security number under the New Deal etc. This is a out right fallacy and promoted by those that are not rooted in the Moorish History, science, culture and law. Therefore, beware! Below is a legal definition of “domicile”
person's legal home. That place where a man has his true, fixed, and permanent
home and principal
establishment, and to which whenever he is absent he has the
intention of returning.
Smith v. Smith, 206 Pa.Super. 310m 213 A.2d 94. Generally, physical
presence within a state and the
intention to make it
one's home are the requisites of establishing a "domicile" therein. The
permanent residence of a person or the place to which he intends
to return even though he
may actually reside elsewhere. A person may have more than one residence
but only one domicile. The
legal domicile of a person is important since it, rather than the actual
residence, often controls the jurisdiction of the taxing authorities and
determines where a person may exercise the privilege of voting and other
legal rights and privileges."
“This right to protect persons having a domicile, though not native-born or naturalized citizens, rests on the firm foundation of justice, and the claim to be protected is earned by considerations which the protecting power is not at liberty to disregard. Such domiciled citizen pays the same price for his protection as native-born or naturalized citizens pay for theirs. He or she is under the bonds of allegiance to the country of his residence, and, if he breaks them, incurs the same penalties. He owes the same obedience to the civil laws. His property is, in the same way and to the same extent as theirs, liable to contribute to the support of the Government. In nearly all respects, his and their condition as to the duties and burdens of Government are undistinguishable.”[Fong Yue Ting v. United States, 149 U.S. 698 (1893)]
Notice the phrase “civil laws” above and the term “claim to be protected”. What they are describing is a contract to procure the protection of the government, from which a “claim” arises. Those who are not party to the domicile/protection contract have no such claim and are immune from the civil jurisdiction of the government. In fact, there are only three ways to become subject to the civil jurisdiction of a specific government. These ways are:
1. Choosing domicile within a specific jurisdiction.
2. Representing an entity that has a domicile within a specific jurisdiction even though not domiciled oneself in said jurisdiction. For instance, representing a federal corporation as a public officer of said corporation, even though domiciled outside the federal zone. The authority for this type of jurisdiction is, for instance, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(b).
in commerce within the civil legislative jurisdiction of a specific
government and thereby waiving sovereign immunity under:
We allege that if the above rules are violated then the following consequences are inevitable:
1. A crime has been committed. That crime is identity theft against a Moorish party and it involves using a person’s legal identity as a “person” for the commercial benefit of someone else without their express consent.
2. If the entity disregarding the above rules claims to be a “government” then it is acting instead as a private corporation and must waive sovereign immunity and approach the other party to the dispute in EQUITY rather than law, and do so in OTHER than a franchise court.
See also Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U.S. 363, 369 (1943) ("`The United States does business on business terms'") (quoting United States v. National Exchange Bank of Baltimore, 270 U.S. 527, 534 (1926) ); Perry v. United States, supra at 352 (1935) ("When the United States, with constitutional authority, makes contracts [or franchises], it has rights and incurs responsibilities similar to those of individuals who are parties to such instruments. There is no difference . . . except that the United States cannot be sued without its consent") (citation omitted); United States v. Bostwick, 94 U.S. 53, 66 (1877) ("The United States, when they contract with their Franchised citizens or Free Moorish Nationals, are controlled by the same laws that govern the citizen in that behalf"); Cooke v. United States, 91 U.S. 389, 398 (1875) (explaining that when the United States "comes down from its position of sovereignty, and enters the domain of commerce, it submits itself to the same laws that govern individuals there").
See Jones, 1 Cl.Ct. at 85 ("Wherever the public and private acts
of the government seem to commingle, a citizen or corporate body must by
supposition be substituted in its place, and then the question be
determined whether the action will lie against the supposed defendant");
O'Neill v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 823, 826 (1982) (sovereign acts
doctrine applies where, "[w]ere [the] contracts exclusively between
private parties, the party hurt by such governing action could not claim
compensation from the other party for the governing action"). The
dissent ignores these statements (including the statement from Jones,
from which case Horowitz drew its reasoning literally verbatim), when it
says, post at 931, that the sovereign acts cases do not emphasize the
need to treat the government-as-contractor the same as a private party.
Lastly, those who have not chosen a domicile within a specific jurisdiction and therefore chosen NOT to become the following in relation to ONLY that jurisdiction, Namely Moors:
1. Among those “governed” by the civil laws.
2. Statutory “citizens” or “residents”.
. . .are called “exclusively private”. Such parties have been acknowledged by the U.S. Supreme Court to be beyond the civil control of the government. Notice they only recognize the right to “regulate” activity of “citizens” who are party to the "social compact" and NOT “ALL PERSONS”:
Authorities supporting the above include the following:
“It is almost unnecessary to say, that what the legislature cannot
do directly, it cannot do indirectly. The stream can mount no
higher than its source. The legislature cannot create corporations with
illegal powers, nor grant unconstitutional powers to those already
do indirectly what the Constitution prohibits directly.”
“In essence, the district court used attorney's fees in this case as an
alternative to, or substitute for, punitive damages (which were not
district court cannot do indirectly what it is prohibited from doing
“It is axiomatic that the government cannot do indirectly (i.e.
through funding decisions) what it cannot do directly.”
Comparison of Republic State v. Corporate State
"It is locality that is determinative of the application of the
Constitution, in such matters as judicial procedure, and not the status
of the people who live in it."
The Federal Constitution, Moorish Constitution Treaty, Zodiac, and the common law are the only thing one needs to protect oneself as a PRIVATE and not PUBLIC entity. That is why we place so much emphasis on natural law, Moorish law recorded on paper and the common law.
A number of legal factors are used in determining one's domicile. The following facts and circumstances, although not necessarily conclusive, have probative value to support a claim of domicile within a particular state:
Other factors indicating an intent to make a state one's domicile may be considered. Normally, the following circumstances do not constitute evidence of domicile sufficient to effect classification as a domiciliary:
So you are able to see that the question of jurisdiction is vast and deems profound study with a strategy to tackle every matter at law. Now, the below information provided is mainly for Moorish Americans to give them an idea on ways to present a legal argument. But please know that it is not conclusive. Also if you are a registered Member of the Moorish Nation within our Moorish Federal System of Government you are entitled to advise in protecting your Moorish Birthrights.
Sample Demonstration on Jurisdiction
The accused recognizes that when jurisdiction is not squarely challenged it is presumed to exist (Burks v. Lasker, 441 US 471). This includes supposed duties, liabilities, and sanctions--- attached by way of statutes--- for violations of said duties (U.S. v. Grimaud, 220 US 506). In this Court there is no meaningful opportunity to challenge jurisdiction, as the Court merely proceeds summarily. However, once jurisdiction has been challenged in the courts, it becomes the responsibility of the plaintiff to assert and prove said jurisdiction (Hagens v.Lavine, 415 US 533, note 5), as mere good faith assertions of power and authority (Jurisdiction) have been abolished. (Owens v. City of Independence, 100 SCt. 1398, 1980).
In this case:
The accused is a free Moor by inherited and birthright who has claimed
all of his inalienable rights at in the Moorish Constitution in lieu of
the Supreme Law of the land. The said court has denied all other
jurisdictions until asserted and proved.
Since the action and the proceedings in this case do not conform to the rules and procedures of the common law, the Accused demands that the court dismiss the charges.
If the court does not dismiss the charges then you as a Moorish-American have 30 days to appear to attempt to reverse the decision by showing where the Judge erred.
The above legal defense is especially presented to all members registered within the Moorish Great Seal Government or Moorish College of the Great Seal. If you have advanced beyond lesson 13 you are entitled to points of interest of how the above is applied while in the process to reclaim your birth rights.
The faithful Moors are recommended to find their homes and hold true to the doctrine therein. If you are a member of more than one group then you should support those groups upon the five principles with love and unity in the lead.
This is all until the spirit guides the Premier to prepare you and your family for further success.
|Clock Of Destiny Moorish International Order Of The Great Seal Of 360°|